Bankart Repair Protocol
Bankart repair rehab protocol after arthroscopic anterior labral repair (anterior shoulder stabilization), by week to 12 months: sling, external rotation targets, phases and criteria, return-to-sport tests, with remplissage and Latarjet options, cited sources and a free printable PDF.
Written for arthroscopic Bankart repair, with or without capsular plication. After open Bankart repair with the subscapularis detached, protect the subscapularis for 4 to 6 weeks (no resisted IR)[21]; no open study gives open repair its own plan.
At a glance (Arthroscopic Bankart repair): sling about 4 wk · ER targets 30°, 50°, 65°, full at wk 3, 6, 9, 12 · no ER at 90° abduction before wk 6 · isometrics wk 3 · bands wk 6 · running wk 10–12 · return to sport from 4–6 mo. Criteria-based.
Timeline
Currently showing: Arthroscopic Bankart repair · Version 2026.11
Phase
Motion
Strength
Restrictions
Milestones
Phase 1 · Protection
wk 0–6Goals
Allowed
Avoid
- ER at 90° abduction (until wk 6)[6]
- Bench press, flys, dips or overhead pressing (practice-based) (until wk 12)
- Behind-the-head pressing or pulldowns, at any stage, even once cleared for sport (practice-based)
Exercises
How protocols differ: Compared protocols range from passive motion from day 1[21, 22] to no shoulder motion for the first 2–3 weeks[23].
Key milestones by week
How this protocol compares with published Bankart repair protocols, on a shared week scale. Criteria-based: advance only when each phase's criteria are met.
Want the patient's dates here? (or weeks post-op).
| Milestone | This protocol | 0816243252 wk Range in published protocols | Published range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sling off | wk 4 | 3–6 wk[2, 1, 4]mean 4.8 wk in 30 protocols |
All phases
Avoid
- ER at 90° abduction (until wk 6)[6]
- Bench press, flys, dips or overhead pressing (practice-based) (until wk 12)
- Behind-the-head pressing or pulldowns, at any stage, even once cleared for sport (practice-based)
Exercises
Avoid
- Bench press, flys, dips or overhead pressing (practice-based) (until wk 12)
- End-range 90/90 ER stretching (throwers, overhead athletes; clinical judgment) (until wk 12)
- Behind-the-head pressing or pulldowns, at any stage, even once cleared for sport (practice-based)
Exercises
Phase 3 · Strength
wk 12–16A positive apprehension test, a subluxation or a dislocation: refer back to the surgeon (clinical judgment).Create HEP for Phase 3 →Allowed
- Resisted 90/90 work, once full motion and scapular control are back[6]
- End-range 90/90 ER stretching for throwers and overhead athletes (clinical judgment)
Avoid
- Behind-the-head pressing or pulldowns, at any stage, even once cleared for sport (practice-based)
- Full-depth or wide-grip bench until about 6 months (practice-based)
Exercises
Advance to Phase 4 when
- ER and IR strength ≥ 80% of the other side (from a Latarjet commentary[7]; clinical judgment for Bankart) test: ER/IR strength
- No apprehension[1] (yes/no check) test: Apprehension
Phase 4 · Return to activity
wk 16–26A positive apprehension test, a subluxation or a dislocation: refer back to the surgeon (clinical judgment).Not returning to sport: discharge once motion is full and functional, ER and IR strength is at least 90% of the other side, WOSI is over 90% and the home program is independent (clinical judgment).Create HEP for Phase 4 →Allowed
- Plyometrics, two hands then one[6, 7]
- Weight room from about wk 16: modified dumbbell bench (limited depth, no wide grip) and light overhead dumbbell work (practice-based)
- Narrow-grip barbell bench with limited depth from about wk 20 (practice-based)
- Non-contact sport from about 4 months, once the criteria are met[1]
Avoid
- Behind-the-head pressing or pulldowns, at any stage, even once cleared for sport (practice-based)
- Contact sport before the criteria are met (until 6 months)[12]
Exercises
Advance to Phase 5 when
- Cleared by the surgeon[1]
- Full pain-free motion and a negative apprehension test[1, 5] (yes/no check) test: Apprehension
- ER and IR strength ≥ 90% of the other side, handheld dynamometer[5, 9] test: ER/IR strength
- CKCUEST 21 touches or more[5, 9, 10] (yes/no check) test: CKCUEST
- Upper Quarter Y-Balance within 10% of the other side[9, 5] test: UQ Y-Balance
- WOSI over 90% (percent of normal, higher is better)[9, 8] or SIRSI over 56[13] (yes/no check) tests: WOSI, SIRSI
Phase 5 · Return to sport
wk 26–52A positive apprehension test, a subluxation or a dislocation: refer back to the surgeon (clinical judgment).Create HEP for Phase 5 →Allowed
- Full-depth bench and heavier overhead lifting, once the return-to-sport criteria are met (practice-based)
- Interval throwing to full distance[8]
Avoid
- Behind-the-head pressing or pulldowns, at any stage, even once cleared for sport (practice-based)
Exercises
Discharge from PT when
Return to contact or overhead sport when
- Cleared by the surgeon[1]
- Full pain-free motion and a negative apprehension test[1, 5] (yes/no check) test: Apprehension
- ER and IR strength ≥ 90% of the other side, handheld dynamometer[5, 9] test: ER/IR strength
- CKCUEST 21 touches or more[5, 9, 10] (yes/no check) test: CKCUEST
- Upper Quarter Y-Balance within 10% of the other side[9, 5] test: UQ Y-Balance
- WOSI over 90% (percent of normal, higher is better)[9, 8] or SIRSI over 56[13] (yes/no check) tests: WOSI, SIRSI
How published protocols differ
Published protocols agree on a short sling and criteria for sport, and differ most on how fast external rotation comes back and when sport starts.
| Decision point | This protocol | Sanford Health[21]source ↗ · rev. Feb 2026 · checked Nov 2026 | UW Health[22]source ↗ · © 2025 · checked Nov 2026 | Lahey Hospital & Medical Center[23]source ↗ · Dec 2019 · checked Nov 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sling | about 4 wk, worn while sleeping | 4–6 wk, at all times until the physician stops it | 3–4 wk; off in safe settings in wk 4 | At all times; wean at 4 wk |
| ER limit, first 6 weeks | Targets 30° by wk 3, 50° by wk 6 | 0–10° by wk 2, 15–20° by wk 4, 50–55° by wk 6 (scapular plane) | To neutral through wk 6 | 0° at the side wk 3–6 (30° in the scapular plane) |
| ER at 90° abduction | None before wk 6; typically full by about wk 12 | From wk 4; full (90–100°) by wk 10 | None for 6 wk; 90° or more to leave Phase III (about wk 15) | 45° in wk 6–12; resisted 90/90 from wk 12 |
| Resisted cuff work starts | wk 6 (light bands at 0° abduction) | Light cuff below shoulder height wk 7–8; bands wk 8 | At 0–45° abduction from wk 6 | From wk 6 |
| Running | About wk 10–12 (practice-based) | Not stated | About wk 10–11, once Phase II criteria are met | Not stated |
| Return to sport | Non-contact about 4 mo; contact 6 mo; throwers compete about 7–9 mo | 6 mo or more; testing at 4–6 mo | Phase V, usually from about wk 20 | Not stated (ends at wk 24) |
| Return-to-sport tests | Apprehension, ER/IR ≥ 90%, CKCUEST ≥ 21, UQ Y-Balance within 10%, WOSI or SIRSI | Throwing to 180 ft pain-free; ER/IR ratio over 80%; a test battery | 100% of the other side on grip, isokinetic and ASH tests; contact athletes also CKCUEST | Physician only; no tests |
| Remplissage covered? | Yes (add-on) | No | In its Latarjet guideline only | No |
Different numbers from the surgeon?
Match the surgeon's protocol →Opens HEP Drop · Free during early access
Each value is a fact in our words, linked to its source with the version and the date we checked it. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the institutions listed.
Tests and measures
Return-to-sport tests are compared with the other side. These are typical criteria: widely proposed and rarely used, and whether they lower redislocation is not settled[5, 9].
| Test | Phase 1 exit | Phase 2 exit | Phase 3 exit | Phase 4 exit · non-contact sport · return to contact or overhead sport |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior apprehension test (negative) | no apprehension | full pain-free motion, negative apprehension | ||
| Whether the anterior apprehension test brings on apprehension. Negative means no apprehension; a stable shoulder with a negative apprehension test is the first ESSKA-ESA return-to-sport criterion[1] | ||||
| ER and IR strength, handheld dynamometer, at 0° and 90° abduction | ≥ 80% | ≥ 90% | ||
| External and internal rotation strength of the operated shoulder as a share of the other side (limb symmetry index). Handheld dynamometer at 0° and at 90° of abduction; operated ÷ other side × 100[5, 9, 10] | ||||
| Closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST) | CKCUEST ≥21 touches | |||
| Upper-limb stability and speed in a closed kinetic chain: hand touches in a set time. Count of touches in 15 seconds; the pass mark is a count[5, 8, 9, 10] | ||||
| Upper Quarter Y-Balance test, composite, compared with the other side | ≥ 90% | |||
| Upper Quarter Y-Balance composite reach of the operated arm as a share of the other arm. Composite reach score; operated ÷ other side × 100[5, 9] | ||||
| Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) | WOSI >90% or SIRSI >56 | |||
| Self-reported shoulder instability symptoms and function. Read here as percent of normal (higher is better), the scoring the return-to-sport sources use. On the normalized 0 to 100 score lower is better: minimal important change 12.8 and acceptable symptom state 40.2 at 2 years after arthroscopic stabilization; smallest detectable change 23% of the raw total[8, 9, 18, 19] Copyrighted instrument: named and linked, never reproduced. About the instrument ↗ | ||||
| Shoulder Instability Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) | WOSI >90% or SIRSI >56 | |||
| Psychological readiness to return to sport after shoulder instability. Self-reported; a higher score before a Latarjet went with return to play by 8 months[13, 20] Copyrighted instrument: named and linked, never reproduced. About the instrument ↗ | ||||
| Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC) | Tracked, not a gate | |||
| Self-reported shoulder and elbow function in overhead and throwing athletes. Tracked, not a gate; under 90 (baseball) or under 88 (other sports) marks higher injury risk[9] Copyrighted instrument: named and linked, never reproduced. About the instrument ↗ | ||||
Each pass mark is this protocol's clinical call, cited to its sources. Questionnaires are named and linked, never reproduced.
References and basis
What backs each recommendation
Our summary, in our own words, of what each source supports. "Strongest evidence" is the study design as published; a review that pools only cadaver studies is listed as a lab study. "Limited evidence" means no randomized trial or systematic review of patient studies is among that row's sources; we do not grade our own recommendations.
| Recommendation | This protocol | Based on | Strongest evidence | What's uncertain |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 · Protection · wk 0–6 | ||||
| Sling | about 4 wk, worn while sleeping | [2] DeFroda 2018[4] Freehill 2023[1] Alentorn-Geli 2026 | Consensus Limited evidence | Protocols use 3 to 6 weeks; the only randomized trial of rehab after Bankart repair, seen through a review, found the same recurrence with faster motion after accelerated rehab[2]. |
| ER and elevation targets | ER 30°, 50°, 65°, full at wk 3, 6, 9, 12 (targets, not caps) | [2] DeFroda 2018[6] Ma 2017 | Narrative review Limited evidence | Early ER limits differ widely, from neutral for 2 weeks[1] to half of pre-operative ER[11]; the ASSET goals are seen only as reproduced in a review[2]. |
| Phase 2 · Motion and early strength · wk 6–12 | ||||
| Resisted cuff work | isometrics wk 3, bands wk 6, 90/90 wk 12 | [12] Amako 2017[10] Kelley 2022[1] Alentorn-Geli 2026[6] Ma 2017 | Cohort study Limited evidence | Starts range from bands at 4 weeks[12] to strengthening at 8–12 weeks[1, 10]; no trial compares them. |
| Running, weight room and end-range ER (practice-based) | running wk 10–12; weight room steps wk 12, 16, 20, 26; end-range 90/90 ER stretching from wk 12 | [2] DeFroda 2018 | Protocol survey Limited evidence | The open literature gives no week for running, overhead pressing or end-range ER stretching after a Bankart repair; bench press came at a mean of 18 weeks in academic protocols[2]. These lines follow compared protocols[21, 22, 23]. |
| Phase 5 · Return to sport · wk 26–52 | ||||
| Return to sport | non-contact about 4 mo; contact 6 mo; throwers compete about 7–9 mo | [1] Alentorn-Geli 2026[12] Amako 2017[6] Ma 2017[5] Högberg 2026[9] Otley 2022 | Cohort study Limited evidence | Criteria are widely proposed and rarely used, and whether they lower recurrence is inconclusive[5, 9]. |
| Modifiers | ||||
| Latarjet | conjoint and subscapularis rules wk 0–6; ER ≤ 30° to wk 3; return from about 4 moProcedure | [1] Alentorn-Geli 2026[7] Bradley 2021[16] Ernstbrunner 2022[20] Bohu 2021 | Cohort study Limited evidence | Latarjet rehab rests on a commentary and a consensus[7, 1]; 73% of 217 patients were back to their main sport by 8 months[20]. No source gives a fixed week for bone-block union. |
| Remplissage add-on | no resisted ER to wk 6; IR stretching gentle to wk 8; no heavy posterior cuff to wk 12Remplissage toggle | [3] Villarreal-Espinosa 2024[14] Frantz 2020[15] Tansey 2025 | Systematic review | 89 to 100% of comparative studies used the plain Bankart plan for remplissage too[3]. Early ER stiffness is common after remplissage: at 6 months, 26% had an ER deficit of 20° or more at the side and 42% at 90° abduction[14]; at 5 years or more, ER at 90° abduction matched pre-operative values[15]. |
- Sling: Protocols use 3 to 6 weeks; the only randomized trial of rehab after Bankart repair, seen through a review, found the same recurrence with faster motion after accelerated rehab[2].
- ER and elevation targets: Early ER limits differ widely, from neutral for 2 weeks[1] to half of pre-operative ER[11]; the ASSET goals are seen only as reproduced in a review[2].
- Resisted cuff work: Starts range from bands at 4 weeks[12] to strengthening at 8–12 weeks[1, 10]; no trial compares them.
- Running, weight room and end-range ER (practice-based): The open literature gives no week for running, overhead pressing or end-range ER stretching after a Bankart repair; bench press came at a mean of 18 weeks in academic protocols[2]. These lines follow compared protocols[21, 22, 23].
- Return to sport: Criteria are widely proposed and rarely used, and whether they lower recurrence is inconclusive[5, 9].
- Latarjet: Latarjet rehab rests on a commentary and a consensus[7, 1]; 73% of 217 patients were back to their main sport by 8 months[20]. No source gives a fixed week for bone-block union.
Bibliography
- 1.Alentorn-Geli E, Brilakis E, Ângelo AC, et al. Age- and time-specific management of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: The 2024 ESSKA-ESA Formal Consensus. Part 2: Treatment and return to sports. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2026;34(8):3040–3051.Consensus statement (ESSKA-ESA 2024 formal consensus, Part 2: treatment, rehabilitation and return to sport) · PMC13418412 (free full text) · doi:10.1002/ksa.70497 · © publisher · cited only · Used for: Sling · Resisted cuff work · Return to sport · Latarjet · Phase details and return to sport
- 2.DeFroda SF, Mehta N, Owens BD. Physical Therapy Protocols for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. Sports Health. 2018;10(3):250–258.Protocol survey (30 online academic protocols for arthroscopic Bankart repair; summarizes the ASSET consensus) · PMC5958453 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/1941738117750553 · © publisher · cited only · Used for: Sling · ER and elevation targets · Running, weight room and end-range ER (practice-based) · Motion targets (ASSET, as reproduced) · Phase details
- 3.Villarreal-Espinosa JB, Reinold MM, Khak M, et al. Rehabilitation Protocol Variability Following Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Remplissage for Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024;19(10):1172–1187.Systematic review (rehab protocols in 41 studies of Bankart repair with remplissage) · PMC11446737 (free full text) · doi:10.26603/001c.123481 · CC BY-NC 4.0 · cited, not reproduced · Used for: Remplissage add-on
- 4.Freehill MT, Murray IR, Calvo E, et al. Shoulder Surgery Postoperative Immobilization: An International Survey of Shoulder Surgeons. Biology (Basel). 2023;12(2):291.Protocol survey (499 US and European shoulder surgeons; sling type and duration by procedure) · PMC9953745 (free full text) · doi:10.3390/biology12020291 · CC BY 4.0 · cited · Used for: Sling
- 5.Högberg J, Królikowska A, Prill R, et al. Objective clinical tests to inform decision-making prior to return to sport in athletes with shoulder instability: A scoping review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2026;34(1):268–283.Scoping review (objective tests before return to sport, 11 studies of operated athletes) · PMC12747614 (free full text) · doi:10.1002/ksa.70107 · CC BY 4.0 · cited · Used for: Return to sport
- 6.Ma R, Brimmo OA, Li X, et al. Current Concepts in Rehabilitation for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(4):499–506.Narrative review (rehab after traumatic anterior instability, with week-by-week limits) · PMC5685970 (free full text) · doi:10.1007/s12178-017-9449-9 · © publisher · cited only · Used for: ER and elevation targets · Resisted cuff work · Return to sport
- 7.Bradley H, Lacheta L, Goldenberg BT, et al. Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Anterior Glenohumeral Instability in the Athlete - Key Considerations for Rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021;16(1):259–269.Narrative review (criterion-based rehab after the Latarjet in athletes (clinical commentary)) · PMC7872454 (free full text) · doi:10.26603/001c.18707 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · cited, not reproduced · Used for: Latarjet
- 8.Wilk KE, Bagwell MS, Davies GJ, et al. Return to Sport Participation Criteria Following Shoulder Injury: A Clinical Commentary. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020;15(4):624–642.Narrative review (return-to-sport criteria after shoulder injury, interval throwing and weight room (clinical commentary)) · PMC7735686 (free full text) · doi:10.26603/ijspt20200624 · © publisher · cited only
- 9.Otley T, Myers H, Lau BC, et al. Return to Sport After Shoulder Stabilization Procedures: A Criteria-Based Testing Continuum to Guide Rehabilitation and Inform Return-to-Play Decision Making. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4(1):e237–e246.Narrative review (criteria-based testing continuum after stabilization, with test thresholds) · PMC8811525 (free full text) · doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.039 · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · cited, not reproduced · Used for: Return to sport
- 10.Kelley TD, Clegg S, Rodenhouse P, et al. Functional Rehabilitation and Return to Play After Arthroscopic Surgical Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability. Sports Health. 2022;14(5):733–739.Cohort study (n = 62 contact and overhead athletes; criteria-based return to play after arthroscopic stabilization) · PMC9460095 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/19417381211062852 · © publisher · cited only · Used for: Resisted cuff work
- 11.Gibson J, Kerss J, Morgan C, et al. Accelerated rehabilitation after arthroscopic Bankart repair in professional footballers. Shoulder Elbow. 2016;8(4):279–286.Cohort study (case series, n = 34 professional footballers; accelerated rehab after arthroscopic Bankart repair) · PMC5023051 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/1758573216647898 · © publisher · cited only
- 12.Amako M, Arino H, Tsuda Y, et al. Recovery of Shoulder Rotational Muscle Strength After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(9):2325967117728684.Cohort study (case series, n = 50; rotation strength recovery after arthroscopic Bankart repair, with its rehab schedule) · PMC5624353 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/2325967117728684 · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · cited, not reproduced · Used for: Resisted cuff work · Return to sport
- 13.Hurley ET, Davey MS, Montgomery C, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for Recurrent Shoulder Instability in Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(9):23259671211023801.Cohort study (n = 124 athletes (62 and 62); arthroscopic Bankart vs open Latarjet, mean 47.7 months) · PMC8436306 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/23259671211023801 · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · cited, not reproduced
- 14.Frantz TL, Everhart JS, Cvetanovich GL, et al. What Are the Effects of Remplissage on 6-Month Strength and Range of Motion After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair? A Multicenter Cohort Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(2):2325967120903283.Cohort study (multicenter; remplissage and 6-month strength and motion after arthroscopic Bankart repair) · PMC7686606 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/2325967120903283 · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · cited, not reproduced · Used for: Remplissage add-on
- 15.Tansey PJ, Clark DS, Ruelos VCB, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage Results in Low Recurrent Instability Rates Without Reducing Shoulder Range of Motion at Midterm Follow-up: A Systematic Review of Studies With Minimum 5-Year Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2025;53(14):3521–3527.Systematic review (3 studies, 144 shoulders, minimum 5 years; Bankart with remplissage) · PMC12657661 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/03635465251324930 · CC BY 4.0 · cited · Used for: Remplissage add-on
- 16.Ernstbrunner L, Waltenspül M, Suter C, et al. Primary Open Latarjet Procedure Results in Functional Differences but No Structural Changes in Subscapularis Muscle Quality vs the Healthy Contralateral Shoulder at Long-term Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(6):1495–1502.Cohort study (case series, n = 42; long-term rotation, strength and subscapularis quality after open Latarjet) · PMC9069664 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/03635465221079858 · CC BY 4.0 · cited · Used for: Latarjet
- 17.Myers H, Wulff K, Antonelli C, et al. Objective Measures for Assessing Readiness to Return to Sport After Shoulder Instability Procedures Are Not Standardized: A Systematic Review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024;6(5):100978.Systematic review (objective return-to-sport measures, 37 studies) · PMC11551362 (free full text) · doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100978 · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · cited, not reproduced
- 18.Saad Berreta R, Khan ZA, Villarreal JB, et al. Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization at 2-Year Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2026;14(6):23259671261442972.Cohort study (n = 65 (labelled case-control); MCID and PASS for WOSI and others 2 years after arthroscopic stabilization) · PMC13254416 (free full text) · doi:10.1177/23259671261442972 · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · cited, not reproduced
- 19.van der Linde JA, Willems WJ, van Kampen DA, et al. Measurement properties of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index in Dutch patients with shoulder instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:211.Cross-sectional study (n = 138; Dutch WOSI reliability, measurement error and smallest detectable change) · PMC4073175 (free full text) · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-211 · CC BY 4.0 · cited
- 20.Bohu Y, Abadie P, van Rooij F, et al. Latarjet procedure enables 73% to return to play within 8 months depending on preoperative SIRSI and Rowe scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(8):2606–2615.Cohort study (n = 217 Latarjet patients; return to play by 8 months and its predictors (SIRSI, Rowe)) · PMC8298242 (free full text) · doi:10.1007/s00167-021-06475-1 · CC BY 4.0 · cited · Used for: Latarjet
Published protocols compared (21–26)
Compared, not endorsed. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the institutions listed. Versions and checked dates match the How published protocols differ table.
- 21.Sanford Health. Bankart repair/anterior capsulorrhaphy rehabilitation guideline [PDF]. Revised Feb 2026.Published protocol · Protocol PDF (www.sanfordhealth.org/-/media/org/files/medical-professionals/resources-and-education/bankart-repair-guideline.pdf) · checked Nov 2026 · Compared, not endorsed · Used for: How protocols differ · Timeline details
- 22.UW Health. Rehabilitation guidelines for anterior shoulder reconstruction with arthroscopic Bankart repair [PDF]. Version © 2025.Published protocol · Guideline PDF (bynder.uwhealth.org/asset/2d9c5574-0f65-4f6e-825b-836651dca0f7/Rehab-Guidelines-Bankart-Repair.pdf) · checked Nov 2026 · Compared, not endorsed · Used for: How protocols differ · Timeline details
- 23.Lahey Hospital & Medical Center. Rehabilitation protocol: arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair of the shoulder - Bankart repair [PDF]. Version Dec 2019.Published protocol · Protocol PDF (www.lahey.org/-/media/files/lhmc/orthopedics/shoulder/lhmc-arthroscopic-anterior-capsulobabral-repair-of-the-shoulder-bankart-repair-rehabilitation.pdf) · checked Nov 2026 · Compared, not endorsed · Used for: How protocols differ · Timeline details
- 24.UW Health. Rehabilitation guidelines for open Latarjet anterior shoulder stabilization [PDF]. Version © 2025.Published protocol · Guideline PDF (bynder.uwhealth.org/asset/013dabfa-852f-402b-a17d-75a56fcaf63f/Rehab-guideline-Open-Latarjet.pdf) · checked Nov 2026 · Compared, not endorsed · Used for: How protocols differ · Timeline details
- 25.Lahey Hospital & Medical Center. Rehabilitation protocol: open Latarjet rehabilitation guidelines [PDF]. Version Jun 2021.Published protocol · Protocol PDF (www.lahey.org/-/media/files/lhmc/orthopedics/shoulder/lhmc-latarjet-rehabilitation-guidelines.pdf) · checked Nov 2026 · Compared, not endorsed · Used for: How protocols differ · Timeline details
- 26.Mass General Brigham. Rehabilitation protocol for Latarjet repair [PDF]. Revised Dec 2021.Published protocol · Protocol PDF (www.massgeneralbrigham.org/content/dam/unified-xwalk/pdf/patient-education/english/rehabilitation-protocol-for-latarjet.pdf) · checked Nov 2026 · Compared, not endorsed · Used for: How protocols differ · Timeline details
Licenses and adaptation. All are licensed under CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). No warranties are given by the original authors.
[9] Otley 2022, [12] Amako 2017, [13] Hurley 2021, [14] Frantz 2020, [17] Myers 2024 and [18] Saad Berreta 2026 are CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, [3] Villarreal-Espinosa 2024 is CC BY-NC 4.0 and [7] Bradley 2021 is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0: we summarize their findings in our own words and reproduce no text, tables or figures. [1] Alentorn-Geli 2026, [2] DeFroda 2018, [6] Ma 2017, [8] Wilk 2020, [10] Kelley 2022, [11] Gibson 2016, [22] UW Health and [24] UW Health (Latarjet) are not openly licensed (all rights reserved): we state their findings and numbers in our own words and reproduce no text, tables or figures.
Published protocols [21]–[26] are compared, not endorsed. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the institutions listed.
Changelog
| Version | Date | What changed | Type | Recommendations affected | Reviewed by | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026.11 | Nov 2026 | First published version | — | All | Licensed PT | 26 |
Bankart Repair Protocol · Arthroscopic Bankart repair · Version 2026.11 · hepdrop.com/p/bankart · The operating surgeon's protocol takes precedence.